Tuesday, September 10, 2013

Creative Non-Fiction Blog Entry #1

             In our last class, we defined Creative Non-Fiction in its simplest form as a work that is both true and written from a first-person point of view.  Some key features that I noticed while reading our assigned texts are as follows:

Key Features:

-          Essential: 
o       A conflict/ personal struggle
o       Self-reflection
o       Creating something extraordinary from something seemingly ordinary
o       Defining moments in one’s life
o       Inner strength
o       Writing to cope
o       Creative description

-          Non-Essential:
o       Harsh realities faced
o       Brutal honesty
o       Acceptance of self
o       Cynical voice
o       Self-deprecating, yet uplifting/humorous voice
o       Finding positive in the negative
o       Conflict resolution




“Out There”- Jo Ann Beard
            In this piece, Beard is very descriptive, and writes almost as if she is telling a fictional story.  Despite the underlying seriousness of her impending divorce and being chased by a derelict, she carries a sarcastic undertone throughout that is nothing less than entertaining, mentioning her delusions of alligators and digging into the element of suspense with her highway car chase.  She faces her personal struggle by taking time to self-reflect, honing in on her inner strength and in turn coping with the situation at hand. 



“Portrait of My Body” – Phillip Lopate
            I found Lopate’s short story to be the most descriptive and humorous piece of the four.  His absolute brutal honesty when reflecting on his thoughts about himself and his self-image is just a snapshot of how self- deprecating someone’s views of themselves can be.  We all carry some element of self-loathing and, in contrast, self-confidence as evidenced by Lopate’s love/hate relationship with himself.  His work is written less like a story and more like a diary or autobiographical confession, touching upon subjects as serious as attempted suicide and as disgusting as his questionable acts of belly-button sniffing.  I found this piece to be uplifting and, at times, inspirational.  Lopate’s emphasis on one’s self-worth is commendable; I believe we all take ourselves too seriously.



“Some Things About That Day” – Debra Marquart
            This was, by far, one of the most depressing and unsettling works I have ever read.  Marquart’s short, cryptic and almost rigid style of writing mirrored the mood of the subject matter.  Her choppy sentences were very cold, monotone and numbing.  Marquart was clearly writing to cope, not just with the loss of her unborn child, but with the choice, the process and the reaction of her husband which makes the reader question their relationship.  This is obviously a defining moment in Marquart’s life, and a symbol of her inner strength, even if she hadn’t much of a choice but to be strong. 





“I Think I’m Musing My Mind” – Roger Ebert
            Ebert’s short story seemed to be written more like a magazine article.  It was autobiographical and reflective in nature, but did not dwell on the conflict at all.  Instead, he turns his inability to speak into a conversation about why he loves writing and that his writing talents seem to more than compensate for his lack of verbal speech.  His continuing positivity throughout the piece is both uplifting and inspirational, showing how one man’s short-comings can be overcome by perseverance and shifting one’s focus from the dwelling on the negative to celebrating the positive.




Differences in Form: Short vs. Long
            In comparing the short pieces to the longer ones, I find that the primary difference is that the longer pieces seem to be written more for the reader’s entertainment than for the writer.  It is clear that the author’s of these two works deliberately chose the descriptive words and ideas that they did in order to evoke a chuckle from their audience at the appropriate times, etc.  Both Beard and Lopate’s writings seem to be more imaginative, whereas Marquart and Ebert tend to be more straightforward and precise.  Marquart’s writing really struck a chord with me.  It felt as if I were seeing the clinic as she described it through her choppy, monotone sentences.  Her language is steady, blunt and numbing, much like the way she was most likely feeling throughout her entire experience.  As I previously mentioned, I felt that Ebert’s piece was written like an informative magazine article, as if someone said to him, “Hey, Roger! Think you could talk to us a little bit about your speech issues and how you’ve overcome them?”  His work was more like a long answer to an interview question, than a story like Beard’s and Lopate’s.
            I feel that all four stories, as with most, if not all, creative non-fiction, were written as coping mechanisms for the author’s.  Whether directly or indirectly, I feel that anyone who writes creative non-fiction is telling a story for a reason, usually in order for themselves to accept it and move on; for once it’s written down, it can be, in a sense, forgotten.  I don’t mean that it necessarily has to be a controversial issue or something unsettling, but people write about things because they are important to them and writing it down is comforting to the soul.


JUST FOR FUN:

I read an interesting New York Times article about a creative writing workshop for Veterans.  I can only imagine the stories that are being written!

Here is the link for anyone who is interested:




No comments:

Post a Comment